This week, we've been blogging on a couple of international conferences concerned with the postal business. Postwatch made a particular contribution to the session on "The role of the Universal Service Obligation".
Joost Vantomme, the Director for Regulatory Affairs at Belgian Post, spoke to the title "The preservation of the USO requires a legally certain and secure financing in case of the removal of the reserved area", while Almast Diedrich, Head of Public Affairs at TNT Post (the Dutch postal service) had as the title of his address "The USO is a commercial advantage for posts and needs no subsidy".
The speaker for Postwatch was our Council member for the Greater London Region, Roger Darlington. He was given the title: "How important is a USO in an age of multiple communication channels?" He suggested that implicit in the title given him was the suggestion that the widespread use of e-mail and the Internet meant that the current USO was no longer necessary. He pointed out, however, that in the UK:
- Some 39% of homes are not connected to the Internet.
- Older consumers are proportionately more likely not to be connected - only 30% of those aged over 65.
- Poorer consumers are proportionately more likely not to be connected - only 36% of low income households.
- Consumers with special needs have problems with use of the Net.
So he acknowledged that the scope and funding of the USO have to be kept under review and could not be regarded as fixed, but argued that currently there was no case for viewing the USO as less important.
Labels: universal service obligation